|
Post by jwal717 on Jun 7, 2007 19:25:03 GMT
Wizards send: Antawn Jamison (81): $15,101,626 + WAS 07 1st Rounder
Warriors send: Al Harrington (81): $7,625,000 --- $8,425,625 --- $9,226,250 --- $10,026,875 Andris Biedrins (72) $1,986,960 --- $2,636,695 --- $3,609,636 12: Patrick O'Bryant (59) $2,601,720 -- $2,216,400 --- $2,370,960 --- $3,020,603
Warriors have the cap space to take on the extra $2.5 million
|
|
|
Post by jwal717 on Jun 7, 2007 19:27:10 GMT
As GM of GS, I accept this trade.
Antawn was the power forward I first targeted as the perfect fit for the Warriors run-and-gun offense.
Harrington was not cutting it for me and with Pau Gasol able to play center, he was expendable. Biendris makes it worth Washington's while to trade Jamison and O'Bryant is to make the salaries more even.
|
|
|
Post by 76erskyd on Jun 7, 2007 19:44:56 GMT
I think that Golden State is overpaying for Jamison.
Anatawn Jamison isnt a great defensive player, neither is Pau.
Biedrins is a good, young, big man that does (I believe) have some defensive ability. O' Bryant is still a rookie, and Harrington is a good powerforward and a more traditional PF than Jamison, whom I consider to be more of a SF than a PF. Maybe if Washington adds a draft pick and O'Bryant leaves the deal I would accept. (the 2 Mil will never be a make or break component of anything)
|
|
|
Post by jwal717 on Jun 7, 2007 21:45:05 GMT
A second rounder at most, I think this is a good deal.
|
|
|
Post by Erik Lassen on Jun 7, 2007 23:00:15 GMT
No go for me. Jamison is not nearly worth that much. If Washington adds in a first it will be a good deal.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Jun 8, 2007 18:17:07 GMT
Yeah a GM would lose his job for doing this deal in real life. I dunno what you're thinking, Golden State. I reject this trade, and that makes three rejects.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jun 8, 2007 20:43:23 GMT
lol, if i toss in my first will it be approved? If so, ill do so.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Jun 8, 2007 21:09:38 GMT
I'd accept it with your 1st rounder in there, yes. I'll move this back to Submit Section for the time being.
|
|
|
Post by jwal717 on Jun 8, 2007 21:19:16 GMT
I obviously accept with Wash's 1st rounder thrown in.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Jun 8, 2007 22:03:54 GMT
After reading Chicago & NOrleans' comments above it looks like that changes the deal for both of them, so it's accepted.
Update your salary and depth charts.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Jun 8, 2007 22:08:23 GMT
Ahh crap, I'm a banana, unless I'm wrong this leave GSW with 11 players. Washington, can you include some filler also?
|
|
|
Post by jwal717 on Jun 9, 2007 18:36:07 GMT
So what is the deal with this trade??
The game will let my team play with 11 guys, it shouldn't be a big deal.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Jun 9, 2007 21:56:18 GMT
Ok I'll have to let the rule slide this one time, since it was my fault it went wrong anyway.
|
|