|
Post by lovethegame on May 15, 2007 0:34:07 GMT
Minnesota Trades:
Randy Foye--$2,448,240(06')--$2,631,840(07')--$2,815,560(08' Team Option)--$3,575,761(09' Team Option)--$4,795,095(10' Qualifying Offer)
Total: $2,448,240 Before:$55,702,757 -1,161,960 After: $54,540,797
Memphis Trades:
H Warrick--$1,286,280 1,286,280 1,376,040 2,119,102 3,021,839
Total: $1,286,280 Before:$46,777,129 +1,161,960 After: $47,939,089
As GM of the Wolves I Accept! Memphis Needs to Accept.
|
|
|
Post by Erik Lassen on May 15, 2007 0:36:34 GMT
Denied. Foye is a much better talent then Warrick in every way possible.
|
|
|
Post by lovethegame on May 15, 2007 0:46:16 GMT
|
|
doc
Rookie
[2-1]
Posts: 28
|
Post by doc on May 15, 2007 0:49:17 GMT
Foye is like one of the better rookies.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on May 15, 2007 0:49:24 GMT
Warrick was dropping 25 a game when Gasol was out... if he was on a team like the Nets he would easily average 15-18 per game
|
|
|
Post by lovethegame on May 15, 2007 0:51:41 GMT
Stats prove whos better.
|
|
|
Post by ryanhall1991 - MEM on May 15, 2007 1:06:12 GMT
i accept
|
|
|
Post by Erik Lassen on May 15, 2007 2:18:17 GMT
I could get 12 ppg playing on the Grizzlies. Foye had to split shots with Mike James, Ricky Davis, and Marko Jaric all in that backcourt, not to mention KG, and Blount up front. And he still had good stats. Foye is also younger by a year.
|
|
|
Post by ryanhall1991 - MEM on May 15, 2007 2:46:53 GMT
no offense but i don't see how you got the best player in the game chicago in a heap deal and then deny this trade that is almost even. If foye did so good while sharing his time and warrick had good stats just because he was on the the grizz, then how come warricks field goal percentage is .100 higher than foye's? this is an even trade, at least by the standard of the rest of the trades made so far
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 15, 2007 12:03:38 GMT
I accept. I think this trade isn't too bad. Foye is a little bit better than Warrick and has better potential, but the TWolves are in need of a PF.
It's up to Chicago though. Don't let my vote sway your decision Chicago.
|
|
|
Post by 76erskyd on May 15, 2007 19:23:56 GMT
Ill accept, I think that younger players are very changed over the next two games
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on May 15, 2007 20:21:46 GMT
Im going to accept. They are both very young & both have the potential to keep improving. I do think that Foye is better & has more potential, but Warrick had a pretty good year too & Minnesota does have a plethora of guards already
|
|
|
Post by Erik Lassen on May 15, 2007 22:46:04 GMT
K I'll cave in. I just didn't notice you had 300 guards.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 16, 2007 0:46:48 GMT
I just didn't notice you had 300 guards. LOL Please update your salary and depth charts.
|
|