|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Nov 16, 2007 22:01:08 GMT
Memphis Trades:
81 C Boozer $11,260,483--$11,260,484 70 N Robinson $1,268,160--$2,020,179--$2,911,078
Seattle Trades:
76 C Wilcox $6,500,000--$6,750,000 80 B Gordon $4,881,669
I say SEA got the better deal since bigman are harder to come by and Boozer is gonna get a ratings boost.
|
|
|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Nov 16, 2007 22:03:30 GMT
Wilcox can put up the same numbers as boozer can in a sim, (trust me i would know) so i think Memphis got the better end.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Nov 16, 2007 22:58:59 GMT
I really like what each team got out of this trade. It was a trade waiting to happen! But of the two lineups I like Seattle's better.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Nov 16, 2007 23:19:02 GMT
damn I voted wrong...I think that memphis will have the better deal...and I dont like Boozer
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Nov 16, 2007 23:23:03 GMT
Boozer is an absolute beast, will be rated 90's next year or the year after, while wilcox will never make it past 80
Gordon is good, but he will be a career around 80, and Nate Robinson isnt gonna do anything special except win dunk contests
Seattle wins
|
|
|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Nov 16, 2007 23:50:14 GMT
Ratings dont matter when it comes to putting up stats. Just take a look at half the players rated 88 or above. You will find players rated 85 and below that put up the same numbers.
Thats all I am saying.
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Nov 17, 2007 0:11:33 GMT
Ratings dont matter when it comes to putting up stats. Just take a look at half the players rated 88 or above. You will find players rated 85 and below that put up the same numbers. Thats all I am saying. You make a good point, case and point Lebron and Dwade
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Nov 17, 2007 2:55:32 GMT
I think that Gordon has a potential...and if the bulls help him he could make a great job...he has a lot of time to do it
|
|