|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Feb 5, 2009 9:07:55 GMT
haha I think Chandler deserves an increase, however small. I would say he's one of the premier big men in the league after the likes of superstars like Yao and Howard. Other than that, there aren't many centers that are better than him. 79 dont cut it IMHO. perhaps a 81-82?
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Feb 5, 2009 11:11:25 GMT
81 imo
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Feb 5, 2009 11:22:22 GMT
81 sounds good enough;)
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Feb 5, 2009 21:44:29 GMT
umm ar eyou serious?
chandler needs a decrease this season, DEFINATELY not an increase... does no one on the committee actually watch basketball!??!??!
if ben wallace goes down to 74, then chandler cant be higher than 75 IMO
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Feb 5, 2009 22:10:15 GMT
huh, Jeebus, I hadn't seen his stats yet this season. 8 and 8, wow. I think New Jersey's closer to being right than Denver. Tyson definitely isn't seeing an increase at any rate.
|
|
|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Feb 5, 2009 22:11:13 GMT
I don't think he got the necessary increase after last seasons great year. He has been down this year though, so 79 is about right.
And NJ, these ratings aren't being discussed in the committee room. What you see here is what it is. Don't lump us all in together by saying the "committee"
|
|