|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Feb 3, 2009 23:16:28 GMT
He's at a 69 right now, and definitely deserves to go up a bit... sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/429013.5, 5 boards, 1+ steal, almost a 3pt per game. Should go up a few points in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by pistons521 - MIA on Feb 4, 2009 1:38:00 GMT
Wilson Chandler does just a little better, but he is only going to a 70. For Young right now, IMO 69-70 is a decent rating.
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Feb 4, 2009 14:02:30 GMT
Well I saw that...Chandler should be higher as well.
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Feb 5, 2009 11:46:41 GMT
at least a 73 for young i say. chandler should be slightly lower. sorry gsw nothing personal
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Feb 14, 2009 13:06:37 GMT
So as for the WIP, I don't see guys like Thaddeus on the list. You're fine with him at a 69, really? Seems a huge oversight to me. Not only Thaddeus but Wilson Chandler, Azubuike, Hawes, and other young guys that are obviously better than a 69/70 seem to be being overlooked.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Feb 14, 2009 19:58:52 GMT
because they are not on mainstream teams and the committee has no idea who any of them are
|
|
|
Post by Golden State Warriors on Feb 14, 2009 20:38:29 GMT
I live in central PA (so pretty much EVERY 76ers game is televised) and I think Young is better then Chandler, even if Chandler has slightly better stats I think Young should be rated slightly higher
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Feb 16, 2009 3:15:08 GMT
I live about hour from philly, and am a Knicks fan, so I've seen both of them play, and I think putting them at the same rating or 1 point apart is fine...they just need to be higher.
and if that's really the reason, NJ, we need a new committee lol.
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Mar 9, 2009 18:58:43 GMT
Thought I'd bring this back up...if Chandler is looking like a 74 to Boston, Thad should be right around there as well.
|
|