|
Post by pistons521 - MIA on Feb 3, 2009 21:34:49 GMT
Currently, Nelson is a 76. Rajon Rondo is a 78, I don't disagree with that. But if Rondo is a 78, Nelson should be slightly higher, I recommend 80. sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3837Nelson is more valuable IMO than Rondo. He is having a breakout year and proving he is a very good PG throughout the league, on one of the best teams around. Nelson from 76 - 80
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Feb 3, 2009 21:36:43 GMT
Nelson could get to an 80 or higher if he keeps up this kinda play, just like Rondo can, for now I'd still say a 78 like Rajon.
|
|
|
Post by pistons521 - MIA on Feb 3, 2009 21:44:16 GMT
At least 79 as long as Rondo is 78. Nelson > Rondo, even if only by a little.
|
|
|
Post by Golden State Warriors on Feb 13, 2009 16:43:45 GMT
I just want to add in I don't think his injury should effect his potential ratings boost but because of it I think he should be stopped at a 78.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Feb 13, 2009 17:58:46 GMT
Added Jameer to the waiting list. A 78 should be fine for now.
|
|