|
Post by greatwall - PHI on Feb 3, 2009 14:10:38 GMT
10 pts, 4 rebs, 3 assts. is for sure a 70 is not higher. Plain and simple and I don't think I have to argue you a lot.
|
|
|
Post by pistons521 - MIA on Feb 3, 2009 16:22:57 GMT
wilson chandler gets better numbers than that and he is only a 70. rodney stuckey is undoubtedly better than sessions and he is only a 73.
|
|
|
Post by greatwall - PHI on Feb 3, 2009 19:06:09 GMT
Wilson Chandler is a 65
|
|
|
Post by pistons521 - MIA on Feb 3, 2009 19:10:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by greatwall - PHI on Feb 3, 2009 20:55:17 GMT
Chandler has better stats than both of them, Stuckey only averages 3 ppg more than Session (and Session plays less.) I think Chandler ought go up and Sessions should be a 70 but that's just me.
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Feb 4, 2009 14:05:34 GMT
I dunno if Boston is generally really cautious with some of these young players...but most of the guys mentioned here need to go up more IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Feb 5, 2009 9:03:29 GMT
I would say Chandler and Stuckey deserves a few more points, perhaps a 2-3 increase would be fair. Sessions is probably a 71 IMHO
|
|