|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Jan 22, 2009 23:33:58 GMT
he is a 69 right now...everyone must know that he deserves at least to be in the low 70s...AT LEAST IMO
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Feb 8, 2009 21:37:07 GMT
So any answer for this one? a 69 is just too bad for him...the guy is great in sims, and is playing good IRL....a 73-75 for him would be good
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Feb 9, 2009 0:01:09 GMT
I'd say somewhere in the 72-75 range...definitely should go up a couple points anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Feb 12, 2009 23:37:00 GMT
So any news on this? its been like 20 days...I need his "right" ratings so I can at least get a higher value for him...
the guy is worth at least a 74..
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Feb 12, 2009 23:49:50 GMT
He's averaging 10/4 this season and hasn't improved from last season, if anything he's regressed. I think a boost in order but a 74 is a little high.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Feb 12, 2009 23:59:00 GMT
AT least a 72....10/4 for a "bench player" who isnt get more minutes than last year is fine...and he is putting almost the same numbers as last year....a 69 is just not fair...at least a 72
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Feb 13, 2009 2:50:05 GMT
There's a reason why he isn't getting as much minutes. He's a one dimensional offensive player and a weak defender.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Feb 13, 2009 14:44:42 GMT
Still worth a 72....69 is just wrong for him
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Feb 13, 2009 16:34:10 GMT
Similar rated players 70 K Azubuike 69 T Young 71 T Outlaw 66 R Gomes 62 CJ Miles 66 M Speights 69 N Young 62 M Bonner 71 H Warrick 70 M Barnes 65 W Chandler 69 F Garcia 64 D Cook 71 J Salmons 71 M Finley
74 is too high for him compared to these players.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Feb 13, 2009 16:56:22 GMT
Ryan Gomes is totally underrated at 66...
actually most of those guys seems to be underrated but anyway as I said a 72 for him is fair...
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Feb 13, 2009 17:09:52 GMT
72 is alright I guess, I was looking at your first post which said at least 73-75.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Feb 13, 2009 17:42:51 GMT
actually my 1st post says at least in the low 70s....and then I say 73-75...72 is fine anyway
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Feb 13, 2009 17:52:59 GMT
72? okay.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Feb 13, 2009 17:59:00 GMT
If u want u can give more
|
|