|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Jan 22, 2009 1:15:06 GMT
Hes proven himself as a legit scoring option IRL. He's averaging 14.6 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 4.0 APG this season.
A rating of 70 just doesn't cut it. I see 74ish.
|
|
|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Feb 2, 2009 21:31:07 GMT
Hes up to 15.4 PPG after a great 2 week span.
I still think hes a glorified 6th man and IMO, a 6th man should not have a rating of anything higher than 75. I see Nate as a 74-75
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Feb 4, 2009 14:06:43 GMT
I'd agree with this...and if Nate goes up to around a 74...how don't Thaddeus, Wilson Chandler, Sessions type guys go to around 72-74 ?
|
|
|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Feb 12, 2009 10:39:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Feb 12, 2009 22:29:37 GMT
haha that was sick. Free reign in the D'Antoni offense (no Duhon that game) is what that equals. Plus against a bad team lol.
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Feb 12, 2009 23:52:15 GMT
Eric Gordon is a beast, just thought I'd get that out there As for Nate, definitely an increase to 74-75? He had a beast game yesterday but not really feeling 13-28 and 2-11.
|
|
|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Feb 24, 2009 6:14:29 GMT
Ok its official, Nate is more than a glorified 6th man.
Dropped 41 points tonight. He has averaged 30.1 ppg over the last 6 games
Updated Season Stats: 17.1 ppg - 4.2 rpg - 4.0 apg
Now i'm expecting a 77-78 rating
|
|
|
Post by gsw23 - POR on Feb 24, 2009 7:15:11 GMT
yes i think 78 rating for nate he is now in the top 10 pgs in the league
|
|
|
Post by mattism2010 - MIAst on Feb 24, 2009 8:16:49 GMT
I think he definitely deserves a raise.. As high as 78? No. He's not as good as Rondo, I can guarantee you that. If Nate gets a 78, Rondo deserves a raise too. Nate plays for the Knicks, that doesn't say much. I say a 76. That's just my opinion though.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Feb 24, 2009 8:58:56 GMT
Yeah definitely. I'll set a 76 for now, but he could go higher (so should Rondo tho, imho)
|
|
|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Feb 24, 2009 9:19:46 GMT
I think he definitely deserves a raise.. As high as 78? No. He's not as good as Rondo, I can guarantee you that. If Nate gets a 78, Rondo deserves a raise too. Nate plays for the Knicks, that doesn't say much. I say a 76. That's just my opinion though. No I do not think he is as good as Rondo, but you using Rondo to comapre with Nate here doesnt really make sense. Rondo is a true PG. He is pass first without a doubt. Please compare Rondo to other PG's. Robinson is a scoring combo guard. Some reasonable comparisons would be Ben Gordon and Monta Ellis. Now of course he isn't on their levels yet, but I could see Nate averaging 20 ppg in a season a la BG and Monta. He just needed consistent PT to show he can score the ball. Knicks or no Knicks, he can score the ball pretty efficiently.
|
|