|
Post by Portland Trailblazers on May 23, 2007 2:02:47 GMT
Orlando Magic Receive Mike Bibby $12,500,000 Total Salary - $12,500,000 Projected Team Salary (ORL) - $59,109,770
Sacramento Kings Receive PF - Pat Garrity - $3,525,000 PG - Carlos Arroyo - $4,000,000 C - Tony Battie - $5,746,000 2007 1st Round Pick (ORL) Total Salary - $13,271,000 Projected Team Salary (SAC) - $59,910,610
I accept, works out better since Jameer isn't involved, so when Bibby declines, I have someone right there to take his spot.
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 23, 2007 2:04:26 GMT
I accept this deal also... I wanted the 07 first rounder badly, and we needed to move Bibby. Fair trade.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 23, 2007 8:42:38 GMT
With the recent trades made by Orlando, the 1st rounder involved in this trade will become weaker in value. Are you ok to accept a weaker 1st rounder and filler for Mike Bibby, Sacramento?
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 23, 2007 17:31:10 GMT
With the recent trades made by Orlando, the 1st rounder involved in this trade will become weaker in value. Are you ok to accept a weaker 1st rounder and filler for Mike Bibby, Sacramento? Yes I am.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 23, 2007 18:01:49 GMT
You have my accept vote then.
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 23, 2007 18:03:34 GMT
You have my accept vote then. Yay. Thank you Boston!!! How many accept votes do I need before I can update my depth chart and salaries?
|
|
|
Post by Erik Lassen on May 23, 2007 20:57:52 GMT
Approved.
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on May 23, 2007 21:35:54 GMT
Is Mike Bibby definitely a free agent in this league next year??
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on May 23, 2007 21:42:45 GMT
Im sorry I dont understand how giving away your best players for salary dumps and a draft pick is considered rebuilding.
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 23, 2007 21:44:52 GMT
Is Mike Bibby definitely a free agent in this league next year?? No he still has two years left...
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on May 23, 2007 21:47:02 GMT
I dont see how this is a fair trade then. Bibby is still producing at a high level & has at least another 3-5 years left in him
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 23, 2007 21:47:57 GMT
I dont see how this is a fair trade then. Bibby is still producing at a high level & has at least another 3-5 years left in him WOW. First this deal included Jameer Nelson. That wasn't a fair trade. No without Nelson it's still not a fair trade?!! WTF....
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on May 23, 2007 21:54:39 GMT
I dont see how this is a fair trade then. Bibby is still producing at a high level & has at least another 3-5 years left in him WOW. First this deal included Jameer Nelson. That wasn't a fair trade. No without Nelson it's still not a fair trade?!! WTF.... If ud read what i wrote the 1st time, it wasnt fair b/c of the draft pick. NELSON for BIBBY is a fair trade. Bibby for nothing and a late 1st round draft pick is not fair & I dont understand your logic for thinking it is
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 23, 2007 21:56:43 GMT
WOW. First this deal included Jameer Nelson. That wasn't a fair trade. No without Nelson it's still not a fair trade?!! WTF.... If ud read what i wrote the 1st time, it wasnt fair b/c of the draft pick. NELSON for BIBBY is a fair trade. Bibby for nothing and a late 1st round draft pick is not fair & I dont understand your logic for thinking it is How do I know it's a late first rounder?
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on May 23, 2007 22:00:14 GMT
C - Dwight Howard 87 PF - Channing Frye 77 SF - Hedo Turkoglu 70 SG - Steve Francis 78 PG - Mike Bibby 81 6th Man- Jameer Nelson 75
U dont think that this team will make the playoffs in an already weak Eastern Conference? Heck the Magic made the playoffs this year in real life too. If this team makes the playoffs(which they most likely will) u are basically trading Bibby for a pick between 20-30 possibly
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 23, 2007 22:01:50 GMT
I'm stockpiling picks...
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 23, 2007 22:02:17 GMT
And I never got a better offer for Bibby...
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on May 23, 2007 22:06:00 GMT
And I never got a better offer for Bibby... I understand u are stockpiling picks, but i dont undersstand trading your best player for a possible late 1st rounder, makes no sense. I also dont understand why u HAVE to trade Bibby right this second
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 23, 2007 22:07:04 GMT
And I never got a better offer for Bibby... I understand u are stockpiling picks, but i dont undersstand trading your best player for a possible late 1st rounder, makes no sense. I also dont understand why u HAVE to trade Bibby right this second I guess your right. How do I decline this trade?
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on May 23, 2007 22:07:53 GMT
Im sorry but I reject this trade & see no reason why this should be approved.
|
|
bamms
Sophomore
Posts: 74
|
Post by bamms on May 23, 2007 22:23:17 GMT
Just to let u know if another trade goes up with Bibby dont not get mad at sac again this trade isnt going through
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 23, 2007 22:31:16 GMT
Just to let u know if another trade goes up with Bibby dont not get mad at sac again this trade isnt going through What?
|
|
|
Post by Portland Trailblazers on May 23, 2007 23:59:20 GMT
So let me get this straight, when it's Nelson and the Pick for Bibby, which the other deal basicly was, my pick apparently is valuable enough to not let the deal go through, but when it's three guys and a pick for Bibby, it de-values the pick?
|
|
|
Post by 76erskyd on May 24, 2007 18:14:52 GMT
you basically traded scrubs and a pick for Bibby, so yes, it does de-value teh pick. Keeping Nelson gives your team a much greater abilitry to win than loosing him. Neither deal was perfectly fair, find a middle ground, give up a better player (worse than nelson) or trade Nelson but get something more than Bibby flat.
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 24, 2007 21:26:42 GMT
OK can we move this trade to the rejected thread so I can post another deal? Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by Erik Lassen on May 25, 2007 2:54:42 GMT
Why are you so eager to trade. Are you trading with a purpose, or are you just trading for the sake of trading?
|
|
|
Post by Portland Trailblazers on May 25, 2007 5:02:59 GMT
I like what I was getting in the other deal, I got rid of Garrity and Outlaw, who I don't like, I got rid of Battie and his horrible contract, and if the pick isn't lottery, which I highly doubt my pick would be, I don't much like draft picks. I got of all those guys out, but I bring in some young guys in Garcia and Douby, and an expiring with Potapenko. But because the first was added, it is so valuable. You can't de-value a pick, because either way, with Bibby, my team would be the same, with this deal or the other one. This one I keep Jameer, but I doubt that he even plays because Bibby is going to play the 40 minutes a night. I liked the other one better, which I offered to him. I've been in sim leagues for a long time, I know what I'm doing
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 25, 2007 10:14:13 GMT
As a result of this trade (and other screw ups) Sacramento has failed his probationary period as a GM and has been removed from his post.
Also, trade rejected.
|
|