|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on May 22, 2007 3:22:02 GMT
Atlanta Receives:
Ron Artest -- $7,150,000 -- $7,800,000 -- $8,450,000 John Salmons -- $4,400,000 -- $4,752,000 -- $5,104,000 -- $5,456,000 -- $5,808,000
Salary before: $48,656,106 Salary after: $50,487,640
Sacramento Receives:
1st round pick 2007 (ATL) Josh Childress -- $2,863,920 -- $3,631,450 -- $4,844,355 Speedy Claxton -- $6,854,546 -- $6,306,182 -- $5,757,818 -- $5,209,454
Salary before: $60,255,610 Salary after: $58,424,076
As GM of the Atlanta Hawks, I accept.
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 22, 2007 3:23:28 GMT
Atlanta Receives:Ron Artest -- $7,150,000 -- $7,800,000 -- $8,450,000 John Salmons -- $4,400,000 -- $4,752,000 -- $5,104,000 -- $5,456,000 -- $5,808,000 Salary before: $48,656,106 Salary after: $50,487,640 Sacramento Receives:1st round pick 2007 (ATL) Josh Childress -- $2,863,920 -- $3,631,450 -- $4,844,355 Speedy Claxton -- $6,854,546 -- $6,306,182 -- $5,757,818 -- $5,209,454 Salary before: $60,255,610 Salary after: $58,424,076 As GM of the Atlanta Hawks, I accept. As GM of the Kings, I accept.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 22, 2007 9:48:31 GMT
I'm just wondering, Atlanta, why you're giving up a pick for another small forward? You already have Josh Smith who can play that position for you.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on May 22, 2007 16:50:30 GMT
I have another trade in the works. If anything, I'm willing to go small like GS. Smith definitely has the capability to play positions 2-4. That would give me an great range of athletic players. Run and Gun baby. LOL.
|
|
|
Post by Erik Lassen on May 22, 2007 21:44:30 GMT
As long as Smith is playing 4 (which he can do) then I approve.
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on May 22, 2007 21:45:26 GMT
Before any approvals/rejections Sacramento needs to fix his Salary page
|
|
|
Post by 76erskyd on May 22, 2007 21:48:26 GMT
I still think taht ATL is overpaying for Artest, Salmons is a bum, Claxton, Smioth and likely a 1st Pick will do more than Artest. I think taht SAC has to gove up a little more, but again, Ill rthink it over, for now Ill reject
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on May 22, 2007 21:53:34 GMT
I'm giving up Childress, not Smith. Although my 1st rounder is lottery projected, Artest is still definitely one of the best defenders in the league, and when I just gave up Claxton, everyone said SAC was getting ripped off. Salmons is a capable back-up at the SG position, and Claxton is basically just a salary cap dump (I have too many PGs that shouldn't be starting).
|
|
|
Post by gpngc on May 22, 2007 23:14:27 GMT
Before any approvals/rejections Sacramento needs to fix his Salary page OK it's fixed...
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 23, 2007 8:37:57 GMT
Both this trade and the other Sacramento trade, both which involve Ron Artest, have been rejected. It is only possible to include one player in one trade at a time.
Sacramento, this is your last warning whilst on probation in your first week as a new GM. I can see you're dedicated but you're also ignorant of the rules. Whatever happened with the two trades you posted, we were going to have to let down one of the GMs you were trading with by choosing which trade you preferred to reject. It's not how I want trading conducted in the league and I'm instantly rejecting both these trades.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 23, 2007 9:16:53 GMT
Also, I feel kinda sorry for Atlanta. They've had trades rejected here with Sacramento, with Seattle (when Seattle included Danny Fortson in two trades) and with Washington (when Washington backed out of a trade), none of them were Atlanta's fault and yet they've been penalized just as much.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on May 23, 2007 17:16:50 GMT
LOL... I have the most rejected trades. Yay! Number #1. ;D
|
|