|
Post by bringit - CHA on May 10, 2009 20:22:08 GMT
Trade 1
To Bobcats
81 Predrag Stojakovic - $13,068,000 - $14,202,000 - $15,366,000 72 Martell Webster - $5,000,000 - $5,500,000 - $6,000,000 - $6,500,000 - $7,000,000 76 Andris Biedrins - $8,000,000 - $9,000,000 - $10,000,000 - $10,500,000 - $11,000,000
Total Incoming: 26.068,000 Total Outgoing: 21,500,000
To Portland
85 Jermaine O'Neal - $17,000,000 - $18,500,000 - $20,000,000 75 Anthony Parker - $4,550,000
Total Incoming: 21,500,000 Total Outgoing: 26.068,000
Works under 1.25 % rule
Trade 2
To Bobcats
85 Jermaine O'Neal - $17,000,000 - $18,500,000 - $20,000,000
Total Incoming:17,000,000 Total Outgoing: 13,000,000
To Portland
72 Martell Webster - $5,000,000 - $5,500,000 - $6,000,000 - $6,500,000 - $7,000,000 76 Andris Biedrins - $8,000,000 - $9,000,000 - $10,000,000 - $10,500,000 - $11,000,000
Total Incoming: 13,000,000 Total Outgoing: 17,000,000
Key Notes:
With the 1.25 % Rules, Portland will be getting back 16,250,000, so i am 750,000 short where now ill be using 50 reward points for this: "Exceed the salary cap by $2,500,000 on a lopsided transation"
|
|
|
Post by bringit - CHA on May 10, 2009 20:23:57 GMT
I accept, Basically this deal was Parker for Peja. Peja with 3 years left on his current deal makes a lot of money, so i help Portland here, cap wise. Parker a UFA, will save him 12 million in the off season. Now im set for my lineup, and hope my streak of winning games continues.
Also, i would like to add, I used 50 reward points for this deal to go over the cap by 2,500,000. Just would like to let the MODS know when voting.
|
|
|
Post by gotmymoney - POR on May 10, 2009 20:31:52 GMT
For my 1st Trade in D5, I Accept. Here are my reasons:
1. Salary Reason, Peja is signed on for 3 years and I save 12 million next year in cap wise 2. Let’s face it, my team is awful, and I need to rebuild it, and I need to trade all my high price players. Peja was 1st on my list. 3. Parker is a great player and I love his game.
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on May 10, 2009 22:36:09 GMT
Yes, Peja's contract is nasty but he is Portland's best player and I think Portland can net at least a pick or prospect for him instead of just getting an expiring,
|
|
|
Post by bringit - CHA on May 10, 2009 23:02:14 GMT
Yes, Peja's contract is nasty but he is Portland's best player and I think Portland can net at least a pick or prospect for him instead of just getting an expiring, couldn't peja be look at as an decent player doing amazing on a shitty team?
|
|
|
Post by gotmymoney - POR on May 11, 2009 21:42:56 GMT
Can we please have some votes on this trade
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 14, 2009 9:53:08 GMT
I accept this trade.
|
|
|
Post by redstorm177 on May 16, 2009 13:57:56 GMT
My bad, I thought I already voted on this one, but I must have only rejected it in my head.
|
|
|
Post by gotmymoney - POR on May 16, 2009 19:54:02 GMT
may i ask, why did you reject this trade? No one will give me 12 plus million in cap space next year and there is no chance this team will make the playoffs. I'm just guessing here New York, but didnt you pull of a deal like this in the past to get some cap space, since you had some awful contracts like Starbury or Curry?
|
|
|
Post by redstorm177 on May 17, 2009 5:02:42 GMT
may i ask, why did you reject this trade? No one will give me 12 plus million in cap space next year and there is no chance this team will make the playoffs. I'm just guessing here New York, but didnt you pull of a deal like this in the past to get some cap space, since you had some awful contracts like Starbury or Curry? Actually, I traded Curry back when his value was at an all-time high and got incredible value in return. And I let Marbury expire as his contract wasn't that long. I don't believe that in this league Peja can only net expiring contracts, and I know that if you search hard enough you can pick up a draft pick or young player to go along with the cap space.
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on May 18, 2009 18:57:05 GMT
I reject for the same reasons that NYK stated.
|
|
|
Post by Erik Lassen on May 18, 2009 19:31:52 GMT
Reject.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 20, 2009 18:25:24 GMT
Wow. I thought this deal was good for both teams *shrug*
Perhaps try reformulating guys.
|
|
|
Post by bringit - CHA on May 20, 2009 19:06:09 GMT
will do
|
|