|
Post by greatwall - PHI on Feb 28, 2009 20:41:15 GMT
I don't know if I have to wait until next year, but he's A LOT better than a 61...he should at least by a 68 but probably higher.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Feb 28, 2009 20:46:15 GMT
Yea I thought that when I saw his rating. He's been frequently kickin ass for Houston this season. I think a 70 might be more like it, without having looked at stats or anything.
|
|
|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Feb 28, 2009 22:02:37 GMT
68-69 seems reasonable. Hes helped them win a few games this year. Not sure if hes on that 70 plateau yet, but you're the boss BOS
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Feb 28, 2009 22:18:45 GMT
Not sure if hes on that 70 plateau yet, but you're the boss BOS No! No! That's why I made this section, I've got as much voice as everyone else. Although... I suppose there's the fact that it's me who edits the official thread... but yea
|
|
|
Post by greatwall - PHI on Feb 28, 2009 22:30:37 GMT
I'd be happy with anything higher than a 68, idk if he's quiet a 70 yet either. If he keeps it up he'll be reward with a boast next year so no biggie.
|
|
|
Post by affect - DET on Mar 1, 2009 8:24:41 GMT
I say give him a rating of 1.
|
|
|
Post by mattism2010 - MIAst on Mar 1, 2009 8:32:13 GMT
lmao I agree with Detroit..
|
|
|
Post by pistons521 - MIA on Mar 1, 2009 8:34:03 GMT
If Von Wafer deserves a 70, Chandler deserves at least a 72 and Bargnani a 76.
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Mar 2, 2009 0:31:22 GMT
Wafer should be 68-69 if guys like Chandler are 70.
|
|
|
Post by greatwall - PHI on Apr 11, 2009 18:16:05 GMT
bump
|
|