|
Post by Utah Jazz on Jan 15, 2008 8:43:00 GMT
Boston Trades:
84 - Emeka Okafor - $5,427,307 93 - Dwyane Wade - $13,041,250
Boston Receives:
85 - Deron Williams - $4,010,640 84 - Josh Smith - $2,243,543 72 - Paul Millsap - $797,581 Austin Croshere's Contract - $7,300,000 Antonio Davis's Contract - $1,250,000
Total Salary Out - $18,468,557 Total Salary In - $15,601,764
-----------------------------------------------------------
Chicago Trades:
84 - Josh Smith - $2,243,543 72 - Paul Millsap - $797,581 Austin Croshere's Contract - $7,300,000 Antonio Davis's - $1,250,000
Chicago Receives:
84 - Emeka Okafor - $5,427,307 75 - Jamal Crawford - $7,920,000
Total Salary Out - $11,591,124 Total Salary In - $13,347,307
------------------------------------------------------------
Utah Trades:
85 - Deron Williams - $4,010,640 75 - Jamal Crawford - $7,920,000
Utah Receives:
93 - Dwyane Wade - $13,041,250
Total Salary Out - $11,930,640 Total Salary In - $13,041,250
-------------------------------------------------------------
As GM of Utah I accept.
Talent wise Chicago & Utah get more in this trade, but this trade gives Boston a salary cap situation that will allow him to resign several key players and possibly a few free agents. Boston also gets a franchise PG in Williams and 2 other young talents.
|
|
|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Jan 15, 2008 9:06:03 GMT
Holy crap! Monster deal. Who else is going to vote on this trade besides NY and I?
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Jan 15, 2008 9:19:02 GMT
Holy crap! Monster deal. Who else is going to vote on this trade besides NY and I? Good question. Maybe we should make some temporary trade voters since 3/5 of the staff are involved in the trade.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Jan 15, 2008 9:45:03 GMT
We'll see what New York has to say first. If both NYK and LAC accept then there's no need for a third party.
I accept the deal. Utah & Chicago get more from the deal talent-wise, but I'm the rebuilding team in this 3-way and I need the cap space for free agents and the like. It's not like I'm getting scrubs in return either!
|
|
|
Post by jwal717 on Jan 15, 2008 15:02:50 GMT
GS approves. I know you all value my opinion greatly.
|
|
|
Post by jwal717 on Jan 15, 2008 15:04:02 GMT
Although Jerry Krause is rolling over in his yet to be dug grave seeing Jamal Crawford back on the Bulls. I think I just heard Jon Paxson crying as well.
|
|
|
Post by Erik Lassen on Jan 15, 2008 20:31:58 GMT
Haha I do it because Josh Smith isn't a great sim league player, and Okafor can push KG back to PF.
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jan 15, 2008 21:39:36 GMT
Woah, biggest deal in D5 history?
|
|
|
Post by Dallas Mavericks on Jan 15, 2008 21:42:01 GMT
not really, the biggest deals were WHEN THE old Laker GM was about to make a great Lakers team into AN ALL EURO Lakers team.
but this is number 2 behind all the deals the OLD Lakers GM did.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Jan 15, 2008 21:42:23 GMT
Woah, biggest deal in D5 history? I can't think of a bigger one...
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jan 15, 2008 22:18:15 GMT
Boston: I think he breaks even in this deal... he trades one expiring player for another of a player of about the same calibur... but D-Wade is better than Deron and has a longer contract...
Chicago: mmmm i guess i like it.... i would never want jamal crawford on my team. Chicago can take the salary hit and should still be able to give Okafor an extension.... he better hope Okafors rating wont go down though after a lousy season in real life
Utah: the big winner in this deal is definately Utah. He gets to trade short contract of Deron who is going to be impossible to resign unless he can get an early extension, and he gets rid of the huge salary of crawford
If I were a committee member, I would approve
|
|
|
Post by ragas2134 - LAC on Jan 15, 2008 22:21:37 GMT
I just don't see how Utah gets Wade for Deron and Crawford. That has to be the steal of the century. The rest of the deal looks ok. Boston deff gets the short end, but like he said hes not getting scrubs.
All in all, not bad. I accept
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Jan 15, 2008 22:31:03 GMT
Jamal Crawford may be expensive, but hes still a pretty good sim league player. Hes averaging 19, 4.5, & 3 in real life too. I know its on the Knicks but hes still producing
|
|
|
Post by Erik Lassen on Jan 16, 2008 3:43:48 GMT
I like Jamal Crawford. He can't play a lick of defense, but he can create shots, and he's in no way a chucker as most people beleive. Add to that, his contract is manageable at only 2 years, and it's not half bad. Emeka is a much better sim league player than J Smoove, but in real life I would never do this.
|
|
|
Post by redstorm177 on Jan 16, 2008 14:44:42 GMT
Jamal Crawford may be expensive, but hes still a pretty good sim league player. Hes averaging 19, 4.5, & 3 in real life too. I know its on the Knicks but hes still producing Well, I was going to accept this deal until I read this cheapshot towards the Knicks. >.< But seriously, this trade seems fair and all three of you guys have been around long enough to know what your doing. ACCEPTED!
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Jan 16, 2008 15:40:51 GMT
!!BLOCKBUSTER!! Update your salary and depth charts guys, please make sure I've got your roster threads all correct because it gets difficult in 3-way trades.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Jan 17, 2008 17:40:50 GMT
6 days must pass before Josh Smith is healthy and this trade can go through.
|
|