|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Apr 6, 2009 14:36:59 GMT
Yes Deng should come down from an 81 IMO...Horford shouldn't be lowered much if at all, kid has been GREAT lately. Brewer should come down...he has never done anything in the NBA in his two years...of course this year he got hurt early, but I'm not sure I saw much of a place for him to play anyway.
dyess maybe down at most 2 points though.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Apr 11, 2009 15:01:06 GMT
Dallas rightfully pointed out Kirk Hinrich. I think he could be as low as a 75.
Kirk Hinrich (80)
PPG 10.2 RPG 2.5 APG 4.0 SPG 1.2
|
|
|
Post by pistons521 - MIA on Apr 11, 2009 15:07:09 GMT
I disagree with decreasing Mcdyess. Starting for the Pistons now he has been a monster.
|
|
|
Post by greatwall - PHI on Apr 11, 2009 18:09:22 GMT
I disagree with Hinrich, when he plays (which is rare) he does well. I don't think you could punish him because the GM won't trade him or Gordon for a big, I say wait till next year to mess with his rating because him or Gordon SHOULD BE gone by then.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Apr 11, 2009 18:54:16 GMT
I disagree with Hinrich, when he plays (which is rare) he does well. I don't think you could punish him because the GM won't trade him or Gordon for a big, I say wait till next year to mess with his rating because him or Gordon SHOULD BE gone by then. Yeah good call.
|
|
|
Post by matt on May 4, 2009 22:12:21 GMT
Looking at your list, BC, I think Gilbert Arenas shuld have his overall rating dropped a slight amount. BUT!!! You should possibly consider increasing his passing rate. He had a 20:1 assist2turnover rate (albeit for 2 games), but has also pledged to pass alot more.
I suggest maybe 85-88 with a decrease in some shooting and maybe primacy, and increase in pass rate.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 5, 2009 16:20:40 GMT
I'd prefer to wait until next season. If he gets busted up again then definitely I'd probably drop it to something like 82, just to account for the ridiculous amount of downtime he has every year.
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on May 5, 2009 22:52:34 GMT
I don't know Live's exact system, but wouldn't it make more sense to just lower his durability rate severely if he gets hurt again, rather than lower his rating? Any time he has been healthy he has been amazing. Lowering his rating because of injury only seems somewhat odd.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 6, 2009 8:14:44 GMT
I don't know Live's exact system, but wouldn't it make more sense to just lower his durability rate severely if he gets hurt again, rather than lower his rating? Any time he has been healthy he has been amazing. Lowering his rating because of injury only seems somewhat odd. Maybe you're right. It's the variable called 'hardy' which determines how hardy a player is, I guess.
|
|
|
Post by matt on May 6, 2009 21:22:55 GMT
I like GSW's idea. That sounds smart.
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on May 6, 2009 21:25:29 GMT
Yea Hardy sounds right. Kind of like toughness or durability.
It's one thing when a guy like Jermaine O'Neal gets hurt and whenever he comes back, his numbers are down significantly. Arenas, we basically have too little information on, but when he was back in a limited fashion, he did very well.
Just my opinion, but the logic seems sound to me lol.
I'm sure if he is injured for like another whole year, I wouldn't mind lowering rating because of injury, but he seems to be the same player he was before injury whenever he gets out there.
|
|
|
Post by matt on May 7, 2009 12:18:59 GMT
I'm sure if he is injured for like another whole year, I wouldn't mind lowering rating because of injury, but he seems to be the same player he was before injury whenever he gets out there. Agreed
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 7, 2009 14:21:00 GMT
Yup yup
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Sept 27, 2009 21:56:36 GMT
Atlanta mentioned that Baron Davis is a disgraceful 88, even after last season with the Clippers IRL.
I'm thinking a high 70s for BD
|
|