|
Post by bringit - CHA on Dec 2, 2009 12:13:36 GMT
you cant do that, boston didnt allow utah to do it
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Dec 8, 2009 9:27:58 GMT
[red]CHA doesn't have 109 RPs anymore.
Allen Iverson is still technically up for negotiations.[/red]
|
|
|
Post by bringit - CHA on Dec 8, 2009 12:16:07 GMT
yeah i did with including the RP i did for you but i guess they dont count. So 80 im offering
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Dec 8, 2009 12:45:29 GMT
[red]You've got 80 max[/red]
|
|
|
Post by bringit - CHA on Dec 10, 2009 20:45:28 GMT
is he mine now?
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Dec 11, 2009 11:35:35 GMT
No because Iverson's set contract is: Year 1 $6,000,000 Year 2 $6,600,000 Total $12,600,000 From what I can see, you don't have the cap room. Amirite?
|
|
|
Post by bringit - CHA on Dec 11, 2009 12:11:22 GMT
what are you kidding me, then why did u say i had a chance at the beginning. You let SAS with 5 million get a chance to sign him but i cant sign him to 5.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Dec 11, 2009 12:42:26 GMT
I didn't know you were restricted to using the MLE, and I thought you'd read the two times I'd posted before your offer that Iverson's contract was limited to: Year 1 $6,000,000 Year 2 $6,600,000
as the contending offer.
|
|
|
Post by bringit - CHA on Dec 11, 2009 12:48:25 GMT
but nevertheless you're in the lead with 83 RPs Charlotte.[/red] and your saying that you didnt no i was using MLE when my first post said 2009/2010: $5,000,000 (MLE) 2010/2011: $5,000,000 2012/2013: $5,000,000 same as SAS, and i bid 83 come on, i just dont get why you said SAS, ORL and WAS can sign him meanwhile SAS was using MLE as well.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Dec 11, 2009 13:01:48 GMT
Actually, when Spurs said: We match that contract by adding a third year . I thought he meant he was trying to add a third year to the deal beginning with $6million. I guess when he wrote: My initial offer was 2 years. I edited the first post to reflect my recent update. I didn't know which offer he was referring to, but he was referring to the initial $5million offer. You can see that I was confused when I later wrote: [red]SAS and ORL have since offered contracts higher than Washington. But Iverson is a volatile guy and I'm going to decrease SAS and ORL's offers to the size of Washington's. Year 1 $6,000,000 Year 2 $6,600,000 Total $12,600,000 SAS, ORL and WAS may start bidding using reward points.[/red]
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Dec 11, 2009 13:04:39 GMT
Also when you wrote: 2009/2010: $5,000,000 (MLE) 2010/2011: $5,000,000 2012/2013: $5,000,000 same as SAS, and i bid 83 and I replied with: [red]I'm restricting contracts to: Year 1 $6,000,000 Year 2 $6,600,000 Total $12,600,000 but nevertheless you're in the lead with 83 RPs Charlotte.[/red] I guess this is just a miscommunication and, upon review, if SAS is offering a third year of $5m, then that can be seen as a valid contract too. I'll allow him to sign with you Charlotte, this mixup is quite an innocent one and the deal is okay as it is. You're spending your 80RPs too.
|
|
|
Post by bringit - CHA on Dec 11, 2009 13:05:03 GMT
ah well you also got me confused lol, so Wizards are in the lead? what if they cant afford him, would i get him or no
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Dec 11, 2009 13:10:55 GMT
No, I'd say you're in the lead with that 3 year, $15million offer and 80 RPs, and I think AI is ready to sign with your team. Is that okay?
|
|
|
Post by bringit - CHA on Dec 11, 2009 20:00:13 GMT
wickedddd lol deal
|
|