|
Post by pistons521 - MIA on Mar 2, 2009 19:03:23 GMT
so should chandlers number be 74 now?
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Mar 2, 2009 19:35:55 GMT
yea ok
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Mar 4, 2009 0:55:34 GMT
when will durant be a 95?
|
|
|
Post by pistons521 - MIA on Mar 4, 2009 1:04:01 GMT
in 2 years
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Mar 5, 2009 16:08:43 GMT
updated a bunch of players
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Mar 19, 2009 12:57:35 GMT
I'll just point it out here again...if Chandler is 74, why not Thaddeus and Azubuike right around that rating?
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Mar 19, 2009 19:32:13 GMT
I'll just point it out here again...if Chandler is 74, why not Thaddeus and Azubuike right around that rating? IMO, from best to worst it is Thaddeus, Chandler, Kelenna id say thaddeus 75, chandler 72, kelenna 70
|
|
|
Post by trizir- HOU on Mar 20, 2009 14:58:59 GMT
Gomes(66), Aaron Brooks(64) should be higher than there current rating
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Mar 20, 2009 16:46:24 GMT
I'll just point it out here again...if Chandler is 74, why not Thaddeus and Azubuike right around that rating? IMO, from best to worst it is Thaddeus, Chandler, Kelenna id say thaddeus 75, chandler 72, kelenna 70 I think the lack of knowledge on kelenna before he came into the league is what's hurting him here...even though he's been in the L for a couple years and all he's done when given time is produce. My personal ranking would be more like Chandler/Thad tied, then kelenna, but there is not a 5 point ratings difference right now between top and bottom. Personal ranking something like Chandler 74 (this has already been laid out by Boston anyway) Thaddeus 74 Azubuike 72 or 73 If you haven't read my feelings on Azubuike, read his page in stock watch again.
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on Apr 13, 2009 14:21:51 GMT
1. Thaddeus should be w/in one point of Chandler. I love both players, but a 3 point difference seems silly.
2. This is the reason I came here to post something. I just looked through EVERY teams players' ratings, and there is a clear problem, in my opinion. I looked only at PF/C type guys, and I noticed something very very odd. There is this kind of clear cut off that has been laid out. there are a large number of PF types rated at around 81 or 82. Then there is only Emeka Okafor at an 84, and Pau Gasol at an 86. Then there are a few guys like Bosh/Amare rated in the low 90's. Plus, I think we already talked about lowering Okafor...AND I think Gasol needs to be right up with the bosh/amare's, maybe just a point or two below them.
Is this really how you view the entire big men in the NBA? basically a ten point ratings difference between one tier and the next?
Seems VERY VERY odd and out of place to me.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Apr 13, 2009 16:40:27 GMT
Post about the big-men in a separate thread GSW. That's what this section is for.
And off the top of my head, Boozer is an 86, your own David West is 82, Al Jefferson is 84...
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on May 10, 2009 2:46:06 GMT
Just wondering...are we going to get all the rating changes done like, before playoffs? or what?
Getting Camby to an 83, Azu to a 73, Thad to a 71, and Blake to a 69 severely changes my teams look...for the better of course, but it's a big factor, and could probably lead to me winning more games. I know everyone else waiting for increases probably feels the same. Now if you don't really have the time, I can relate. Just want to know when you expect to be able to complete them.
For the record, I still don't understand/don't agree with the Chandler/Thad/Azu ratings that are in the 1st post...
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on May 10, 2009 9:15:16 GMT
Just wondering...are we going to get all the rating changes done like, before playoffs? or what? Getting Camby to an 83, Azu to a 73, Thad to a 71, and Blake to a 69 severely changes my teams look...for the better of course, but it's a big factor, and could probably lead to me winning more games. I know everyone else waiting for increases probably feels the same. Now if you don't really have the time, I can relate. Just want to know when you expect to be able to complete them. For the record, I still don't understand/don't agree with the Chandler/Thad/Azu ratings that are in the 1st post... I've got my uber essays to do at the moment. They'll be done on the 19th. After that I'll have time for player rating changes.
|
|
|
Post by jlawdrummer - GSW on May 10, 2009 20:19:55 GMT
Cool man. Good luck on the essays.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Sept 27, 2009 18:07:26 GMT
updated these guys Andersen Granger Varejao Stuckey Bonner S. Blake J. Nelson
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Oct 1, 2009 13:27:05 GMT
updated: ++ Nate Robinson John Salmons
-- Smush Parker Shawn Marion Josh Howard Allen Iverson
|
|
|
Post by Golden State Warriors on Oct 9, 2009 15:32:26 GMT
So Chris Andersen got a ratings boost to a 75?
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Oct 9, 2009 16:10:45 GMT
Yep
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Oct 11, 2009 13:50:50 GMT
updated
Rondo Nelson Calderon
|
|